%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SYO297^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:32:25 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 22.63s
% Output   : FiniteModel 22.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO297^5 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n089.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 04:52:48 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime: 
% 22.63/9.68  Nitpicking formula...
% 22.63/9.68  Timestamp: 04:52:57
% 22.63/9.68  The type bnd_n passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be able to skip
% 22.63/9.68  some scopes
% 22.63/9.68  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 22.63/9.68  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 22.63/9.68  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 22.63/9.68    card bnd_n = 1
% 22.63/9.68    card bnd_n = 2
% 22.63/9.68    card bnd_n = 3
% 22.63/9.68    card bnd_n = 4
% 22.63/9.68    card bnd_n = 5
% 22.63/9.68  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 22.63/9.68  Nitpick found a counterexample for card bnd_n = 2:
% 22.63/9.68  
% 22.63/9.68    Skolem constants:
% 22.63/9.68      Xp = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := True, b2 := False)
% 22.63/9.68      Xx = b2
% 22.63/9.68    Constants:
% 22.63/9.68      bnd_c0 = b1
% 22.63/9.68      bnd_cS = (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := b1, b2 := b1)
% 22.63/9.68  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 22.63/9.68  Total time: 919 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------