TSTP Solution File: SYO290^5 by cocATP---0.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem : SYO290^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:51:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.66s
% Output : Proof 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : SYO290^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Mar 12 01:21:42 EST 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5
% 0.47/0.66 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e995a8>, <kernel.Type object at 0x1e99638>) of role type named a_type
% 0.47/0.66 Using role type
% 0.47/0.66 Declaring a:Type
% 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e9df80>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1e995f0>) of role type named g2
% 0.47/0.66 Using role type
% 0.47/0.66 Declaring g2:(a->a)
% 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e993f8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x213ab90>) of role type named g1
% 0.47/0.66 Using role type
% 0.47/0.66 Declaring g1:(a->a)
% 0.47/0.66 FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x1e99128>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x1e99248>) of role type named p
% 0.47/0.66 Using role type
% 0.47/0.66 Declaring p:((a->a)->Prop)
% 0.47/0.66 FOF formula ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) of role conjecture named cTRANS_BUG_EX2
% 0.47/0.66 Conjecture to prove = ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))):Prop
% 0.47/0.66 Parameter a_DUMMY:a.
% 0.47/0.66 We need to prove ['((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))']
% 0.47/0.66 Parameter a:Type.
% 0.47/0.66 Parameter g2:(a->a).
% 0.47/0.66 Parameter g1:(a->a).
% 0.47/0.66 Parameter p:((a->a)->Prop).
% 0.47/0.66 Trying to prove ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))
% 0.47/0.66 Found classic0:=(classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))):((or (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) (not (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.66 Found (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) as proof of ((or (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False))
% 0.47/0.66 Found (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) as proof of ((or (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False))
% 0.47/0.66 Found (or_comm_i00 (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))
% 0.47/0.66 Found ((or_comm_i0 ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))
% 0.47/0.66 Found (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))
% 0.47/0.66 Found (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))) as proof of ((or ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx)))))
% 0.47/0.66 Got proof (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.66 Time elapsed = 0.054044s
% 0.47/0.66 node=20 cost=12.000000 depth=5
% 0.47/0.66 ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.47/0.66 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.66 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.66 (((or_comm_i (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))) ((p (fun (Xw:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xw))))->False)) (classic (p (fun (Xx:a)=> (g1 (g2 Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.66 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------