TSTP Solution File: SYO290^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO290^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 3 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &; 24 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 6 ^ 1 !; 0 ?; 7 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_22,type,
g2: a > a ).
thf(decl_23,type,
g1: a > a ).
thf(decl_24,type,
p: ( a > a ) > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
esk1_0: a > a ).
thf(cTRANS_BUG_EX2,conjecture,
( ~ ( p
@ ^ [X1: a] : ( g1 @ ( g2 @ X1 ) ) )
| ( p
@ ^ [X2: a] : ( g1 @ ( g2 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTRANS_BUG_EX2) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ~ ( p
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ( g1 @ ( g2 @ Z0 ) ) )
| ( p
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ( g1 @ ( g2 @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTRANS_BUG_EX2])])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ( p
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ( g1 @ ( g2 @ Z0 ) ) )
& ~ ( p
@ ^ [Z0: a] : ( g1 @ ( g2 @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
! [X3: a] :
( ( esk1_0 @ X3 )
= ( g1 @ ( g2 @ X3 ) ) ),
introduced(definition) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ( p @ esk1_0 )
= $true ),
inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ( p @ esk1_0 )
!= $true ),
inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]),c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p @ esk1_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO290^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:21:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # sh2lt with pid 28203 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by sh2lt
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: HUUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_ho_10 with pid 28205 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: HUUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 142
% 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 13
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1804 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------