TSTP Solution File: SYO289^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO289^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 2 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 2 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 1 &; 10 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 10 ( 10 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 ^ 9 !; 2 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
epred1_0: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(cTRIV2,conjecture,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i > $o] : ( X3 @ X2 )
=> ? [X4: $i] : ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTRIV2) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i > $o] : ( X3 @ X2 )
=> ? [X4: $i] : ( X1 @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTRIV2]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X11: $i > $o,X12: $i] :
( ( X11 @ esk1_0 )
& ~ ( epred1_0 @ X12 @ esk1_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i > $o] : ( X3 @ esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SYO289^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:39:37 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.38 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.39 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.15/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.15/0.39 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # post_as_ho1 with pid 21445 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.15/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.15/0.39 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.39 # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
% 0.15/0.39 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # new_ho_10 with pid 21452 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.15/0.39 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.15/0.39 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.39 # Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
% 0.15/0.39 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.39 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.15/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.15/0.39 # Processed clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 1
% 0.15/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 123
% 0.15/0.39 # Search garbage collected termcells : 57
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.39 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.39 # Total time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1588 pages
% 0.15/0.39
% 0.15/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.39 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.39 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.15/0.39 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.39 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------