%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : SYO287^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 19:31:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 64.51s 64.70s
% Output   : Proof 64.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYO287^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 12:46:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 64.51/64.70  % SZS status Theorem
% 64.51/64.70  % Mode: mode453
% 64.51/64.70  % Inferences: 1087
% 64.51/64.70  % SZS output start Proof
% 64.51/64.70  thf(cSV9,conjecture,(~((![X1:$i>$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ c0) = ((~((cA @ X2))) => ((cB @ X2) @ X2)))))))))).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(h0,negated_conjecture,(![X1:$i>$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ c0) = ((~((cA @ X2))) => ((cB @ X2) @ X2))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cSV9])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(ax761, axiom, (~(p1)|~(p239)), file('<stdin>', ax761)).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(nax239, axiom, (p239<=![X1:$i]:((~(fcA @ X1)=>fcB @ X1 @ X1)<=>(~(fcA @ X1)=>fcB @ X1 @ X1))), file('<stdin>', nax239)).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(ax999, axiom, p1, file('<stdin>', ax999)).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(c_0_3, plain, (~p1|~p239), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax761])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(c_0_4, plain, p239, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[nax239])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(c_0_5, plain, (~p1|~p239), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(c_0_6, plain, p1, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax999])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(c_0_7, plain, p239, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(c_0_8, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), c_0_7])]), ['proof']).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(1,plain,$false,inference(eprover,[status(thm),assumptions([h0])],[])).
% 64.51/64.70  thf(0,theorem,(~((![X1:$i>$i>$o]:(~((![X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2) @ c0) = ((~((cA @ X2))) => ((cB @ X2) @ X2))))))))),inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[1,h0])).
% 64.51/64.70  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------