TSTP Solution File: SYO281^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO281^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO281^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:54:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_3, type, sK0: $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_4, type, sK1: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(func_def_7, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 $false),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f19])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f19,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ($true != $true)),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f12])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 (((^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)) @ (sK1 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($true)))) != $true)),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f11])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X1 @ (sK1 @ X1)))) )),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($true != (X1 @ (sK1 @ X1))) & ((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1)) = $true))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) => ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ X2)))),
% 0.13/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) & ($true = (sK0 @ X2))) => (($true != (X1 @ (sK1 @ X1))) & ((sK0 @ (sK1 @ X1)) = $true)))),
% 0.13/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ? [X0 : $i > $o] : ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ? [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X2) = $true))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) => ((X1 @ X2) = $true))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37 ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.37 ~! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2))),
% 0.13/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.13/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.37 ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2))),
% 0.13/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTRIV3)).
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (3470)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (3462)Success in time 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------