TSTP Solution File: SYO258^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO258^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SYO258^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 08:39:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30631)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30635)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30636)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.15/0.38  % (30637)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30634)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30633)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30635)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30632)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30631)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_1, type, cQ: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_2, type, cP: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_7, type, sK0: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(func_def_10, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    $false),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f17])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f17,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ($false = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f15])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    (((^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)) @ (sK0 @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false)))) = $true)),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f10])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ( ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (($true = (X1 @ (sK0 @ X1)))) )),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ((cP @ a @ b) = $true) & ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((cQ @ b @ X0) = $true) & ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ((! [X3] : (((cQ @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((cP @ (sK0 @ X1) @ X3) != $true)) | ((X1 @ a) != $true)) & ($true = (X1 @ (sK0 @ X1))))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f7,f8])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ! [X1 : $i > $o] : (? [X2] : ((! [X3] : (((cQ @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((cP @ X2 @ X3) != $true)) | ((X1 @ a) != $true)) & ((X1 @ X2) = $true)) => ((! [X3] : (((cQ @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((cP @ (sK0 @ X1) @ X3) != $true)) | ((X1 @ a) != $true)) & ($true = (X1 @ (sK0 @ X1)))))),
% 0.15/0.38    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ((cP @ a @ b) = $true) & ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((cQ @ b @ X0) = $true) & ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ? [X2] : ((! [X3] : (((cQ @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((cP @ X2 @ X3) != $true)) | ((X1 @ a) != $true)) & ((X1 @ X2) = $true))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ! [X1 : $i > $o] : ? [X2] : ((! [X3] : (((cQ @ X3 @ X1) != $true) | ((cP @ X2 @ X3) != $true)) | ((X1 @ a) != $true)) & ((X1 @ X2) = $true)) & (! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((cQ @ b @ X0) = $true) & ((cP @ a @ b) = $true))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ~((! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((cQ @ b @ X0) = $true) & ((cP @ a @ b) = $true)) => ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) => (((X1 @ a) = $true) & ? [X3] : (((cQ @ X3 @ X1) = $true) & ((cP @ X2 @ X3) = $true)))))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.15/0.38    ~((! [X0 : $i > $o] : (cQ @ b @ X0) & (cP @ a @ b)) => ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X1 @ X2) => (? [X3] : ((cP @ X2 @ X3) & (cQ @ X3 @ X1)) & (X1 @ a))))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38    ~((! [X0 : $i > $o] : (cQ @ b @ X0) & (cP @ a @ b)) => ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X1 @ X2) => (? [X3] : ((cP @ X2 @ X3) & (cQ @ X3 @ X1)) & (X1 @ a))))),
% 0.15/0.38    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.15/0.38  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.15/0.38    (! [X0 : $i > $o] : (cQ @ b @ X0) & (cP @ a @ b)) => ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ! [X2] : ((X1 @ X2) => (? [X3] : ((cP @ X2 @ X3) & (cQ @ X3 @ X1)) & (X1 @ a)))),
% 0.15/0.38    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBLEDSOE_FENG_6)).
% 0.15/0.38  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30630)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.38  % (30627)Success in time 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.38  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------