TSTP Solution File: SYO245^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO245^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 6 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 13 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 78 ( 14 ~; 5 |; 4 &; 49 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 29 ( 29 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 5 ^ 19 !; 6 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
esk1_0: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(decl_23,type,
esk2_2: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(cTHM193A,conjecture,
( ! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
( ? [X2: $i > $o] :
( ~ ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) )
& ( ( X1
@ ^ [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i > $o] :
( ~ ( X4 @ ( X1 @ X4 ) )
& ( X3
= ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) )
= ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )
=> ? [X2: $i > $o] :
( ~ ( X2 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) )
& ( ( X1
@ ^ [X3: $i] :
? [X4: $i > $o] :
( ~ ( X4 @ ( X1 @ X4 ) )
& ( X3
= ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) )
= ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
=> ~ ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
! [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
= ( X1 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X5 = X6 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM193A) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $i] : $true
=> ~ ? [X1: ( $i > $o ) > $i] :
! [X5: $i > $o,X6: $i > $o] :
( ( ( X1 @ X5 )
= ( X1 @ X6 ) )
=> ( X5 = X6 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM193A])])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X14: $i > $o,X15: $i > $o] :
( ( ( esk1_0 @ X14 )
!= ( esk1_0 @ X15 ) )
| ( X14 = X15 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X4: $i > $o] :
( ( X2 = X4 )
| ( ( esk1_0 @ X2 )
!= ( esk1_0 @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o] :
( ( esk2_2 @ ( esk1_0 @ X2 ) )
= X2 ),
inference(recognize_injectivity,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X17: $i] :
( ( esk2_2 @ ( esk1_0 @ X2 ) @ X17 )
<=> ( X2 @ X17 ) ),
inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( esk2_2 @ ( esk1_0 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
| ~ ( X2 @ X3 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( esk2_2
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
~ ( X2 @ Z0 ) )
@ X3 )
| ( X2 @ X3 ) ),
inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i > $o,X3: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X3 )
| ~ ( esk2_2 @ ( esk1_0 @ X2 ) @ X3 ) ),
inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_2
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
~ ( esk2_2 @ Z0 @ Z0 ) )
@ ( esk1_0
@ ^ [Z0: $i] :
~ ( esk2_2 @ Z0 @ Z0 ) ) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.15 % Problem : SYO245^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.05/0.17 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.38 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:34:23 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.54 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.55 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # sh2lt with pid 26311 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Result found by sh2lt
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.24/0.55 # Search class: HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # post_as_ho10 with pid 26315 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Result found by post_as_ho10
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.24/0.55 # Search class: HHUPF-FFSF00-SHHFFFBN
% 0.24/0.55 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55 # Starting post_as_ho10 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Initial clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # Processed clauses : 39
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/0.55 # ...subsumed : 11
% 0.24/0.55 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.24/0.55 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.24/0.55 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Generated clauses : 81
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 51
% 0.24/0.55 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Paramodulations : 30
% 0.24/0.55 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.24/0.55 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Equation resolutions : 12
% 0.24/0.55 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.24/0.55 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.24/0.55 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.24/0.55 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.55 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.24/0.55 # ...number of literals in the above : 24
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.24/0.55 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 124
% 0.24/0.55 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 108
% 0.24/0.55 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.24/0.55 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.24/0.55 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # BW rewrite match attempts : 22
% 0.24/0.55 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.24/0.55 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3892
% 0.24/0.55 # Search garbage collected termcells : 87
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.55 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.55 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.55 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.24/0.55 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.24/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------