TSTP Solution File: SYO226^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO226^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &; 20 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 11 ( 11 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 ^ 10 !; 0 ?; 10 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
thf(decl_23,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk3_1: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $i ).
thf(cTHM47B,conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i > $i > $o] :
( ! [X4: $i] : ( X3 @ X4 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM47B) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ! [X3: $i > $i > $o] :
( ! [X4: $i] : ( X3 @ X4 @ X4 )
=> ( X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM47B]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X11: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( ~ ( X11 @ ( esk3_1 @ X11 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X11 ) )
| ( X11 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 ) )
& ( esk1_0 != esk2_0 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i > $i > $o] :
( ( X3 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0 )
| ~ ( X3 @ ( esk3_1 @ X3 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]),c_0_3]),c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.10 % Problem : SYO226^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:48:38 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # post_as_ho1 with pid 25067 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by post_as_ho1
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HHUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # ehoh_best_nonlift with pid 25074 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46 # Search class: HHUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
% 0.17/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.17/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 279
% 0.17/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 77
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.17/0.46
% 0.17/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.17/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------