TSTP Solution File: SYO220^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO220^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:33 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYO220^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 11:02:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25671)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25672)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25674)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25669)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25675)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37 % (25672)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37 % (25671)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37 % (25673)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 thf(func_def_5, type, sK2: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 $false),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f11])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ( ! [X3 : $i] : (((sK2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 (($true != (sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0)) & ! [X3] : ((sK2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) & (sK0 = sK1)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ? [X0,X1] : (? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X1 @ X0)) & ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) & (X0 = X1)) => (? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X2 @ sK1 @ sK0) != $true) & ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) & (sK0 = sK1))),
% 0.14/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (((X2 @ sK1 @ sK0) != $true) & ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) => (($true != (sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0)) & ! [X3] : ((sK2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true))),
% 0.14/0.37 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ? [X0,X1] : (? [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (($true != (X2 @ X1 @ X0)) & ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true)) & (X0 = X1))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~! [X1,X0] : ((X0 = X1) => ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3 @ X3) = $true) => ($true = (X2 @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~! [X0,X1] : ((X0 = X1) => ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X3] : (X2 @ X3 @ X3) => (X2 @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~! [X1,X0] : ((X0 = X1) => ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X3] : (X2 @ X3 @ X3) => (X2 @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37 ! [X1,X0] : ((X0 = X1) => ! [X2 : $i > $i > $o] : (! [X3] : (X2 @ X3 @ X3) => (X2 @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.14/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM47A)).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ((sK2 @ sK1 @ sK1) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f12,f10])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 (sK0 = sK1)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ($true != (sK2 @ sK1 @ sK0))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (25670)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (25668)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------