TSTP Solution File: SYO219^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO219^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:45:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 8 ~; 0 |; 1 &; 20 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 15 ( 15 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 1 ^ 12 !; 4 ?; 17 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
cS: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_23,type,
esk1_0: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
esk2_1: ( $i > $i ) > $i ).
thf(cTHM6,conjecture,
( ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cS @ X1 )
!= X1 )
=> ~ ? [X2: $i > $i > $i] :
! [X3: $i > $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X4 )
= X3 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM6) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cS @ X1 )
!= X1 )
=> ~ ? [X2: $i > $i > $i] :
! [X3: $i > $i] :
? [X4: $i] :
( ( X2 @ X4 )
= X3 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM6])]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X9: $i,X11: $i > $i] :
( ( ( cS @ X9 )
!= X9 )
& ( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X11 ) )
= X11 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i > $i] :
( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X3 ) )
= X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( cS @ X1 )
!= X1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i > $i,X1: $i] :
( ( esk1_0 @ ( esk2_1 @ X3 ) @ X1 )
= ( X3 @ X1 ) ),
inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X3: $i > $i,X1: $i] :
( ( esk1_0
@ ( esk2_1
@ ^ [Z0: $i] : ( cS @ ( X3 @ Z0 ) ) )
@ X1 )
!= ( X3 @ X1 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYO219^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:30:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_ho_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # post_as_ho12 with pid 15211 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # post_as_ho12 with pid 15221 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by post_as_ho12
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 46
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 32
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 42
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 28
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3171
% 0.21/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 64
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1580 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------