TSTP Solution File: SYO203^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO203^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   8 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (  25   ~;   7   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  25  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   68 (  68 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    0 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   3 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f15]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    q = $true,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( q = $true ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f11]) ).

tff(f11,plain,
    p = $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f9,plain,
    ( ( ( r = $true )
      | ( q != $true ) )
    & ( r != $true )
    & ( p = $true )
    & ( ( q = $true )
      | ( p != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( ( r != $true )
    & ( p = $true )
    & ( ( q = $true )
      | ( p != $true ) )
    & ( ( r = $true )
      | ( q != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f7,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( q = $true )
       => ( r = $true ) )
     => ( ( ( q != $true )
         => ( p != $true ) )
       => ( ( p = $true )
         => ( r = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f6,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( q = $true )
       => ( r = $true ) )
     => ( ( ( q != $true )
         => ( p != $true ) )
       => ( ( p = $true )
         => ( r = $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ( q
       => r )
     => ( ( ~ q
         => ~ p )
       => ( p
         => r ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

tff(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( q
       => r )
     => ( ( ~ q
         => ~ p )
       => ( p
         => r ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( q
     => r )
   => ( ( ~ q
       => ~ p )
     => ( p
       => r ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cPROP_2003_3_13) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    ( ( q = $true )
    | ( p != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    q != $true,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    r != $true,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ( ( r = $true )
    | ( q != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : SYO203^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 09:20:38 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.37  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.37  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.39  % (10160)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10156)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10155)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10154)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.39  % (10154)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39  % (10157)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10159)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10155)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (10153)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.39  % (10152)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.40  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------