TSTP Solution File: SYO197^5 by cocATP---0.2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem : SYO197^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 0s
% DateTime : Tue Mar 29 00:50:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.65s
% Output : Proof 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYO197^5 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Mar 11 18:06:14 EST 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.33 ModuleCmd_Load.c(213):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for 'python/python27'
% 0.12/0.34 Python 2.7.5
% 0.47/0.65 Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 0.47/0.65 FOF formula ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) of role conjecture named cCT18
% 0.47/0.65 Conjecture to prove = ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))):Prop
% 0.47/0.65 We need to prove ['((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))']
% 0.47/0.65 Trying to prove ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.65 Found False:Prop
% 0.47/0.65 Found False as proof of Prop
% 0.47/0.65 Found x0:Xz
% 0.47/0.65 Instantiate: x:=Xz:Prop
% 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0) as proof of x
% 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0) as proof of (Xz->x)
% 0.47/0.65 Found (ex_intro010 (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))
% 0.47/0.65 Found ((ex_intro01 Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))
% 0.47/0.65 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))
% 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))
% 0.47/0.65 Found (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0))) as proof of (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))
% 0.47/0.65 Found ((ex_intro00 False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.65 Found (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> (((ex_intro0 (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.65 Found ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.65 Found ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0)))) as proof of ((ex Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))))))
% 0.47/0.65 Got proof ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0))))
% 0.47/0.65 Time elapsed = 0.049142s
% 0.47/0.65 node=11 cost=325.000000 depth=10
% 0.47/0.65 ::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.47/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.65 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.65 ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xy:Prop)=> (forall (Xz:Prop), ((ex Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx)))))) False) (fun (Xz:Prop)=> ((((ex_intro Prop) (fun (Xx:Prop)=> (Xz->Xx))) Xz) (fun (x0:Xz)=> x0))))
% 0.47/0.65 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------