TSTP Solution File: SYO154^5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYO154^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:44:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 5 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 60 ( 9 ~; 4 |; 7 &; 34 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 5 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 ^ 12 !; 2 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
cR: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_23,type,
g: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
cQ: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_25,type,
f: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_26,type,
cP: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
a: $i ).
thf(cDEMO_TRIV1,conjecture,
( ( ( cP @ a )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cP @ X1 )
=> ( cQ @ ( f @ X1 ) ) )
& ! [X2: $i] :
( ( cQ @ X2 )
=> ( cR @ ( g @ X2 ) ) ) )
=> ? [X3: $i] : ( cR @ X3 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cDEMO_TRIV1) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( cP @ a )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( cP @ X1 )
=> ( cQ @ ( f @ X1 ) ) )
& ! [X2: $i] :
( ( cQ @ X2 )
=> ( cR @ ( g @ X2 ) ) ) )
=> ? [X3: $i] : ( cR @ X3 ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cDEMO_TRIV1]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X7: $i,X8: $i,X9: $i] :
( ( cP @ a )
& ( ~ ( cP @ X7 )
| ( cQ @ ( f @ X7 ) ) )
& ( ~ ( cQ @ X8 )
| ( cR @ ( g @ X8 ) ) )
& ~ ( cR @ X9 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( cR @ ( g @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( cQ @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
~ ( cR @ X1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( cQ @ ( f @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( cP @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
~ ( cQ @ X1 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
cP @ a,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
~ ( cP @ X1 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYO154^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:10:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # ho_unfolding_6 with pid 20555 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by ho_unfolding_6
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # new_ho_10 with pid 20560 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.47 # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47 # Starting new_ho_10 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 4
% 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 354
% 0.18/0.47 # Search garbage collected termcells : 111
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1568 pages
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.18/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------