TSTP Solution File: SYO136^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO136^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:04 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYO136^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 08:55:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37  % (2220)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2224)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37  % (2223)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37  % (2220)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.37  % (2221)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  thf(func_def_0, type, cQ: $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(func_def_3, type, cP: $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    $false),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f10])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($true != (cQ @ X1))) )),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ((cQ @ x) = $true) & ((cB = $true) | (($true = (cP @ sK0)) & (cB != $true))) & ! [X1] : ($true != (cQ @ X1))),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f7,f8])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ? [X0] : ((cP @ X0) = $true) => ($true = (cP @ sK0))),
% 0.13/0.37    introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ((cQ @ x) = $true) & ((cB = $true) | (? [X0] : ((cP @ X0) = $true) & (cB != $true))) & ! [X1] : ($true != (cQ @ X1))),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    (! [X1] : ($true != (cQ @ X1)) & ((cQ @ x) = $true)) & ((cB = $true) | (? [X0] : ((cP @ X0) = $true) & (cB != $true)))),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ~(((? [X0] : ((cP @ X0) = $true) => (cB = $true)) => (cB = $true)) => (((cQ @ x) = $true) => ? [X1] : ($true = (cQ @ X1))))),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ~(((? [X0] : (cP @ X0) => cB) => cB) => ((cQ @ x) => ? [X1] : (cQ @ X1)))),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.37    ~(((? [X0] : (cP @ X0) => cB) => cB) => ((cQ @ x) => ? [X0] : (cQ @ X0)))),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.37    ((? [X0] : (cP @ X0) => cB) => cB) => ((cQ @ x) => ? [X0] : (cQ @ X0))),
% 0.13/0.37    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cADDHYP3)).
% 0.13/0.37  thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.13/0.37    ((cQ @ x) = $true)),
% 0.13/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37  % (2222)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37  % (2218)Success in time 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------