TSTP Solution File: SYO129^5 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO129^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:03:02 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYO129^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 09:05:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.34 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19149)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19148)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19150)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19152)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19153)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.36 % (19148)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.36 % (19149)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.36 thf(func_def_1, type, cP: $i > $o).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f28,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 $false),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f21,f23,f25,f27])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f27,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 spl0_3),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f26])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f26,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 $false | spl0_3),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f7])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cP @ X0) = $true)) )),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 (((cP @ c) != $true) | ((cP @ b) != $true) | ((cP @ a) != $true)) & ! [X0] : ((cP @ X0) = $true)),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ~(! [X0] : ((cP @ X0) = $true) => (((cP @ b) = $true) & ((cP @ a) = $true) & ((cP @ c) = $true)))),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ~(! [X0] : (cP @ X0) => ((cP @ c) & (cP @ b) & (cP @ a)))),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.36 ~(! [X0] : (cP @ X0) => ((cP @ c) & (cP @ b) & (cP @ a)))),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.36 ! [X0] : (cP @ X0) => ((cP @ c) & (cP @ b) & (cP @ a))),
% 0.13/0.36 file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cALLCONJ3)).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ((cP @ b) != $true) | spl0_3),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f18])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f18,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 spl0_3 <=> ((cP @ b) = $true)),
% 0.13/0.36 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f25,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 spl0_2),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f24])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f24,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 $false | spl0_2),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f7])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ((cP @ a) != $true) | spl0_2),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f14])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 spl0_2 <=> ((cP @ a) = $true)),
% 0.13/0.36 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f23,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 spl0_1),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f22])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f22,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 $false | spl0_1),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f7])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ((cP @ c) != $true) | spl0_1),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f10])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 spl0_1 <=> ((cP @ c) = $true)),
% 0.13/0.36 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f21,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ~spl0_1 | ~spl0_2 | ~spl0_3),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f18,f14,f10])).
% 0.13/0.36 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.13/0.36 ((cP @ c) != $true) | ((cP @ a) != $true) | ((cP @ b) != $true)),
% 0.13/0.36 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (19147)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 % (19146)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------