TSTP Solution File: SYO119^5 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SYO119^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:10:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SYO119^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 10:57:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (29379)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-29379"
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  thf(type_def_5, type, sTfun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_1, type, cP: $i > $o).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_5, type, kCOMB: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType]:(X0 > X1 > X0)).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_6, type, bCOMB: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType, X2: $tType]:((X1 > X2) > (X0 > X1) > X0 > X2)).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_7, type, vAND: $o > $o > $o).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_8, type, vOR: $o > $o > $o).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_9, type, vIMP: $o > $o > $o).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_10, type, vNOT: $o > $o).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(func_def_11, type, vEQ: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > X0 > $o)).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    $false),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f8])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ( ! [X0 : $i] : ((vAPP($i,$o,cP,X0) = $true)) )),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    (vAPP($i,$o,cP,a) != $true) & ! [X0] : (vAPP($i,$o,cP,X0) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~(! [X0] : (vAPP($i,$o,cP,X0) = $true) => (vAPP($i,$o,cP,a) = $true))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~(! [X0] : vAPP($i,$o,cP,X0) => vAPP($i,$o,cP,a))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37    ~(! [X0] : vAPP($i,$o,cP,X0) => vAPP($i,$o,cP,a))),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37    ! [X0] : vAPP($i,$o,cP,X0) => vAPP($i,$o,cP,a)),
% 0.14/0.37    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cEXX1)).
% 0.14/0.37  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37    (vAPP($i,$o,cP,a) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.37    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Memory used [KB]: 734
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (29384)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (29379)Success in time 0.013 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------