TSTP Solution File: SYO057^1 by Nitpick---2016

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : SYO057^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n077.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 19:31:49 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 22.35s
% Output   : FiniteModel 22.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYO057^1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n077.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 04:31:49 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime: 
% 22.35/9.36  Nitpicking formula...
% 22.35/9.36  Timestamp: 04:31:57
% 22.35/9.36  The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 22.35/9.36  able to skip some scopes
% 22.35/9.36  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 22.35/9.36  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 22.35/9.36  Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 22.35/9.36    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 22.35/9.36    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 22.35/9.36    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 22.35/9.36    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 22.35/9.36    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 22.35/9.36  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 22.35/9.36  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1:
% 22.35/9.36  
% 22.35/9.36    Skolem constants:
% 22.35/9.36      R = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True))
% 22.35/9.36      \<lambda>Va. ??.bnd_mbox.V = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)
% 22.35/9.36      ??.bnd_mbox.V = i1
% 22.35/9.36      ??.bnd_mforall_prop.P = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)
% 22.35/9.36      ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i1
% 22.35/9.36  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 22.35/9.36  Total time: 518 ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------