TSTP Solution File: SYO042^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : SYO042^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:44:23 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   5 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  138 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   56 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  161 (  48   ~;  44   |;  25   &;  37   @)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   5 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    g: $o > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    p: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    x: $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    y: $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk1_0: $o ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ( ( x
    <~> y )
    & ( ( g @ x )
    <=> y )
    & ( ( g @ y )
    <=> x )
    & ( p @ g )
    & ~ ( p @ $not ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',4) ).

thf(c_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ ( x
      <=> y )
    & ( ( ( ~ x
          | ( g @ $true ) )
        & ( x
          | ( g @ $false ) ) )
    <=> y )
    & ( ( ( ~ y
          | ( g @ $true ) )
        & ( y
          | ( g @ $false ) ) )
    <=> x )
    & ( p @ g )
    & ~ ( p @ $not ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[4])]) ).

thf(c_0_2,plain,
    ( ( ~ x
      | ~ y )
    & ( x
      | y )
    & ( ~ x
      | x
      | y )
    & ( ~ ( g @ $false )
      | x
      | y )
    & ( ~ x
      | ~ ( g @ $true )
      | y )
    & ( ~ ( g @ $false )
      | ~ ( g @ $true )
      | y )
    & ( ~ x
      | ( g @ $true )
      | ~ y )
    & ( x
      | ( g @ $false )
      | ~ y )
    & ( ~ y
      | y
      | x )
    & ( ~ ( g @ $false )
      | y
      | x )
    & ( ~ y
      | ~ ( g @ $true )
      | x )
    & ( ~ ( g @ $false )
      | ~ ( g @ $true )
      | x )
    & ( ~ y
      | ( g @ $true )
      | ~ x )
    & ( y
      | ( g @ $false )
      | ~ x )
    & ( p @ g )
    & ~ ( p @ $not ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,plain,
    ( x
    | ~ y
    | ~ ( g @ $true ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( x
    | y ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ~ ( p @ $not ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    p @ g,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( y
    | ~ x
    | ~ ( g @ $true ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( x
    | ~ ( g @ $true ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    $not != g,
    inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ x
    | ~ y ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( y
    | ~ ( g @ $true ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ esk1_0
  <~> ( g @ esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ~ ( g @ $true ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( x
    | ( g @ ~ $true )
    | ~ y ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ esk1_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]),c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ( g @ ~ $true )
    | x ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ ( g @ ~ $true ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( y
    | ( g @ ~ $true )
    | ~ x ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    x,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ( g @ ~ $true )
    | y ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ y,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_19])]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SYO042^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.22/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.22/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.22/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 09:49:38 EDT 2024
% 0.22/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.52  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.22/0.53  # partial match(1): HSSSSLSSSSSCSSN
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSCSFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # sh3 with pid 13011 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by sh3
% 0.22/0.53  # partial match(1): HSSSSLSSSSSCSSN
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSCSFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SSFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh3 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_2 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # sh3 with pid 13022 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by sh3
% 0.22/0.53  # partial match(1): HSSSSLSSSSSCSSN
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSSSCSFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SSFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh3 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.22/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 20
% 0.22/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.22/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.22/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.22/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 21
% 0.22/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.22/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.22/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 10
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.22/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.22/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.22/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # NegExts                              : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 8
% 0.22/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.22/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.22/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.22/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.22/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11
% 0.22/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.22/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.22/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.22/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1033
% 0.22/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 99
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.53  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.53  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.22/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------