TSTP Solution File: SYO031^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO031^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:02:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 15
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 9 unt; 2 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 74 ( 26 equ; 3 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 70 ( 18 ~; 8 |; 0 &; 43 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 13 ( 13 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 2 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 12 ^ 11 !; 4 ?; 28 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_3,type,
sK0: ( $o > $o ) > $o ).
thf(func_def_5,type,
ph2:
!>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).
thf(f94,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f93]) ).
thf(f93,plain,
$true = $false,
inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f92]) ).
thf(f92,plain,
( $false = ~ $false ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f90]) ).
thf(f90,plain,
( ( $false = ~ $false )
| ( $true = $false ) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f9,f87]) ).
thf(f87,plain,
( $false
= ( sK0 @ (~) ) ),
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f86]) ).
thf(f86,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0 @ (~) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ (~) ) ) ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f70]) ).
thf(f70,plain,
( ( $false
= ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( ^ [Y1: $o] : Y1
@ Y0 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( ^ [Y0: $o] : Y0
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( ^ [Y1: $o] : Y1
@ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f19]) ).
thf(f19,plain,
! [X3: $o > $o] :
( ( $false
= ( X3
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).
thf(f18,plain,
! [X3: $o > $o] :
( ( ( ~ ( X3
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) )
= $true )
| ( $false
= ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f13]) ).
thf(f13,plain,
! [X3: $o > $o] :
( ( ( ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 )
@ ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) )
= $true )
| ( $false
= ( sK0
@ ^ [Y0: $o] :
~ ( X3 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f8]) ).
thf(f8,plain,
! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( $true
= ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
| ( $false
= ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f7]) ).
thf(f7,plain,
! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
= ( sK0 @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
thf(f6,plain,
! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
= ( sK0 @ X0 ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f4,f5]) ).
thf(f5,plain,
! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ? [X1: $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 )
= X1 )
=> ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
= ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
thf(f4,plain,
! [X0: $o > $o] :
? [X1: $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 )
= X1 ),
inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).
thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ! [X0: $o > $o] :
? [X1: $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 )
= X1 ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
thf(f1,conjecture,
~ ! [X0: $o > $o] :
? [X1: $o] :
( ( X0 @ X1 )
= X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).
thf(f9,plain,
! [X0: $o > $o] :
( ( $false
= ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
| ( $true
= ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f7]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYO031^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 10:28:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.13/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.37 % (2653)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2659)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2657)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2656)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2655)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2660)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)First to succeed.
% 0.13/0.37 % (2659)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2658)------------------------------
% 0.13/0.37 % (2652)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------