TSTP Solution File: SYO022^1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYO022^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:02:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   26
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  26 unt;   3 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  259 (  73 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  252 ( 106   ~;  65   |;  20   &;  45   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   62 (  62   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (   9 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%                                         (   4  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (  75   ^   2   !;   0   ?;  78   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    leibeq: ( $o > $o > $o ) > ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK1: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_15,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f82,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f58,f59,f69,f75,f81]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f80]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f52,f64]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ( sK4 = $false )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ( sK4 = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( sK4 = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f50,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( sK4 = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f74]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f70]) ).

thf(f70,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f56,f68]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $false )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f66]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( sK3 = $false ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f54]) ).

thf(f54,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( sK3 = $true ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f34,f66,f62]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $false )
    | ( sK4 = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $false )
    | ( sK3 = $false )
    | ( sK4 = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( $true = ~ sK3 )
    | ( sK3 = $false )
    | ( sK4 = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $false )
    | ( sK4 = $false )
    | ( $true = ~ sK3 )
    | ( sK4 = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ~ sK4 = $true )
    | ( $true = ~ sK3 )
    | ( sK4 = $false )
    | ( sK3 = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( sK4 = $false )
    | ( sK3 = $false )
    | ( ( ~ sK3
        | ~ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4
        & sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ sK3
        | ~ sK4 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ~ ( ~ sK3
            | ~ sK4 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK4
        & sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( sK4
      & sK3 )
   != ( ~ ( ~ sK3
          | ~ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ sK3
            | ~ Y0 )
      @ sK4 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $o] :
          ( Y0
          & sK3 )
      @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $o] :
          ( Y0
          & sK3 ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ sK3
            | ~ Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 )
      @ sK3 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 )
      @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
            ( Y1
            & Y0 ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
            ~ ( ~ Y0
              | ~ Y1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f17,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( sK1
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
            ( Y1
            & Y0 ) )
     => ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
            ~ ( ~ Y0
              | ~ Y1 ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
          ( ( Y0
            @ ^ [Y1: $o,Y2: $o] :
                ( Y2
                & Y1 ) )
         => ( Y0
            @ ^ [Y1: $o,Y2: $o] :
                ~ ( ~ Y1
                  | ~ Y2 ) ) )
      @ sK1 )
    = $false ),
    inference(sigma_clausification,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( !! @ ( ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o )
      @ ^ [Y0: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
          ( ( Y0
            @ ^ [Y1: $o,Y2: $o] :
                ( Y2
                & Y1 ) )
         => ( Y0
            @ ^ [Y1: $o,Y2: $o] :
                ~ ( ~ Y1
                  | ~ Y2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o > $o,Y1: $o > $o > $o] :
          ( !! @ ( ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) )
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 )
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o > $o,Y1: $o > $o > $o] :
          ( !! @ ( ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( leibeq
    = ( ^ [Y0: $o > $o > $o,Y1: $o > $o > $o] :
          ( !! @ ( ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o )
          @ ^ [Y2: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
              ( ( Y2 @ Y0 )
             => ( Y2 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $o > $o > $o,X1: $o > $o > $o] :
        ! [X2: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = leibeq ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( ^ [X0: $o > $o > $o,X1: $o > $o > $o] :
        ! [X2: ( $o > $o > $o ) > $o] :
          ( ( X2 @ X0 )
         => ( X2 @ X1 ) ) )
    = leibeq ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leibeq) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( leibeq
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 )
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( leibeq
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 )
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( leibeq
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 )
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ Y0
            | ~ Y1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( leibeq
      @ ^ [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
          ( X0
          & X1 )
      @ ^ [X2: $o,X3: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ X3
            | ~ X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( leibeq
      @ ^ [X3: $o,X4: $o] :
          ( X3
          & X4 )
      @ ^ [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
          ~ ( ~ X1
            | ~ X0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,conjecture,
    ( leibeq
    @ ^ [X3: $o,X4: $o] :
        ( X3
        & X4 )
    @ ^ [X0: $o,X1: $o] :
        ~ ( ~ X1
          | ~ X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1
      @ ^ [Y0: $o,Y1: $o] :
          ( Y1
          & Y0 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f42,f50]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    sK4 = $true,
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f41]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( sK4 = $true )
    | ( sK4 = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ~ sK4 = $false )
    | ( sK4 = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f37]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ( ( sK4 = $true )
    | ( ( ~ sK3
        | ~ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( ~ sK3
            | ~ sK4 ) ) )
    | ( sK4 = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ( ( sK4
        & sK3 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( ~ ( ~ sK3
            | ~ sK4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f58,plain,
    spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f47,f54]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    sK3 = $true,
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $true )
    | ( sK3 = $true ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( $false = ~ sK3 )
    | ( sK3 = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( sK3 = $true )
    | ( ( ~ sK3
        | ~ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(not_proxy_clausification,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ~ ( ~ sK3
            | ~ sK4 ) ) )
    | ( sK3 = $true ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.12  % Problem    : SYO022^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 10:57:37 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.34  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36  % (9068)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.36  % (9073)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (9068)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (9067)Success in time 0.012 s
% 0.14/0.37  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------