TSTP Solution File: SYO012^1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYO012^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 09:02:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.37s
% Output : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYO012^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 08:42:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.37 % (1388)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37 % (1388)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.37 % (1383)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1382)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1384)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1386)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1385)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1387)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 thf(func_def_2, type, p: $o > $o).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 $false),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f8])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ((p @ (a & b)) != $true)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ((p @ (a & b)) != $true) & ((p @ (a & b)) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~(((p @ (a & b)) = $true) => ((p @ (a & b)) = $true))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~((p @ b & a) => (p @ b & a))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37 ~((p @ b & a) => (p @ b & a))),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.14/0.37 (p @ b & a) => (p @ b & a)),
% 0.14/0.37 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)).
% 0.14/0.37 thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.14/0.37 ((p @ (a & b)) = $true)),
% 0.14/0.37 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.14/0.37 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (1389)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37 % (1381)Success in time 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.37 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------