TSTP Solution File: SYN983_8 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN983_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:55:30 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN983_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:04:52 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # new_bool_3 with pid 24859 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24862 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.48 tff(decl_22, type, a: $o).
% 0.19/0.48 tff(decl_23, type, b: $o).
% 0.19/0.48 tff(decl_24, type, p: $o > $o).
% 0.19/0.48 fof(thm, conjecture, ((p(a)&p(b))=>p((a&b))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm)).
% 0.19/0.48 fof(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((((~a|p($true))&(a|p($false)))&((~b|p($true))&(b|p($false))))=>((~((a&b))|p($true))&((a&b)|p($false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm])])).
% 0.19/0.48 fof(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ((((~a|p($true))&(a|p($false)))&((~b|p($true))&(b|p($false))))&((((~a|~b|a)&(~p($false)|a))&((~a|~b|b)&(~p($false)|b)))&((~a|~b|~p($true))&(~p($false)|~p($true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, (a|~p($false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (a|p($false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~a|~b|~p($true)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (a), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, (b|p($false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (b|~p($false)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p($true)|~a), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~p($true)|~b), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (b), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (p($true)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_6])])).
% 0.19/0.48 cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])]), c_0_12])]), ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 406
% 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 79
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------