TSTP Solution File: SYN979+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:33:15 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.53s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 90 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 8 avg)
% Number of connectives : 102 ( 23 ~; 16 |; 54 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 9 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 18 !; 10 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f18,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f16,f15]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
~ p(sK0,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X2,X3] :
( ~ p(sK0,sK1)
& s(sK0)
& ( p(X2,X3)
| ~ s(sK0) )
& r(sK1)
& r(sK0)
& ( p(sK1,X3)
| ~ r(X3) )
& q(sK1)
& q(sK0)
& ( p(X2,sK0)
| ~ q(X2) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f4,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] :
! [X2,X3] :
( ~ p(X0,X1)
& s(X0)
& ( p(X2,X3)
| ~ s(X0) )
& r(X1)
& r(X0)
& ( p(X1,X3)
| ~ r(X3) )
& q(X1)
& q(X0)
& ( p(X2,X0)
| ~ q(X2) ) )
=> ! [X3,X2] :
( ~ p(sK0,sK1)
& s(sK0)
& ( p(X2,X3)
| ~ s(sK0) )
& r(sK1)
& r(sK0)
& ( p(sK1,X3)
| ~ r(X3) )
& q(sK1)
& q(sK0)
& ( p(X2,sK0)
| ~ q(X2) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
! [X2,X3] :
( ~ p(X0,X1)
& s(X0)
& ( p(X2,X3)
| ~ s(X0) )
& r(X1)
& r(X0)
& ( p(X1,X3)
| ~ r(X3) )
& q(X1)
& q(X0)
& ( p(X2,X0)
| ~ q(X2) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
! [X2,X3] :
( ~ p(X0,X1)
& s(X0)
& ( p(X2,X3)
| ~ s(X0) )
& r(X1)
& r(X0)
& ( p(X1,X3)
| ~ r(X3) )
& q(X1)
& q(X0)
& ( p(X2,X0)
| ~ q(X2) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
? [X2,X3] :
( ( s(X0)
& ( s(X0)
=> p(X2,X3) )
& r(X1)
& r(X0)
& ( r(X3)
=> p(X1,X3) )
& q(X1)
& q(X0)
& ( q(X2)
=> p(X2,X0) ) )
=> p(X0,X1) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
? [X2,X3] :
( ( s(X0)
& ( s(X0)
=> p(X2,X3) )
& r(X1)
& r(X0)
& ( r(X3)
=> p(X1,X3) )
& q(X1)
& q(X0)
& ( q(X2)
=> p(X2,X0) ) )
=> p(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X2,X3] : p(X2,X3),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f13,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
s(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X2,X3] :
( p(X2,X3)
| ~ s(sK0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:10:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.15/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21811)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21815)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21814)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)First to succeed.
% 0.53/0.74 % (21813)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21816)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-21808"
% 0.53/0.74 % (21815)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.74 % (21810)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21813)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.74 % (21816)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.53/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)------------------------------
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.53/0.74
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Memory used [KB]: 958
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.53/0.74 % (21812)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.53/0.74 % (21808)Success in time 0.375 s
% 0.53/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------