TSTP Solution File: SYN965+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYN965+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:06:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 11 ~; 10 |; 9 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 10 sgn 5 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
? [X1] :
! [X2] :
? [X3] :
( ( p(X3,X2)
=> ? [X4] : p(X4,X3) )
& ( ( p(X1,X3)
& p(X3,X1) )
=> p(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_this) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
! [X2] :
? [X3] :
( ( p(X3,X2)
=> ? [X4] : p(X4,X3) )
& ( ( p(X1,X3)
& p(X3,X1) )
=> p(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X5,X7,X8] :
( ( p(X5,X7)
| p(X7,esk1_1(X5)) )
& ( p(X7,X5)
| p(X7,esk1_1(X5)) )
& ( ~ p(X7,esk1_1(X5))
| p(X7,esk1_1(X5)) )
& ( p(X5,X7)
| ~ p(X8,X7) )
& ( p(X7,X5)
| ~ p(X8,X7) )
& ( ~ p(X7,esk1_1(X5))
| ~ p(X8,X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( p(X3,X2)
| ~ p(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,esk1_1(X2))
| p(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( p(X2,X3)
| ~ p(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1,X2)
| ~ p(X2,esk1_1(X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
p(X1,esk1_1(X2)),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN965+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:23:27 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 11
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 16
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 16
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 369
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2760 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------