TSTP Solution File: SYN960+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN960+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:33:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.72s 0.90s
% Output : Refutation 0.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 3 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 20 !; 28 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f29,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f15,f24,f26,f28]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
( ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f14]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
( ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3)
| ~ spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( spl4_1
<=> ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( a(sK2,sK3)
| ~ spl4_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( spl4_2
<=> a(sK2,sK3) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
( ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl4_1
| ~ spl4_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f23,f14]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( a(sK1,sK0)
| ~ spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl4_3
<=> a(sK1,sK0) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_3])]) ).
fof(f24,plain,
( spl4_2
| spl4_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f21,f17]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
( a(sK1,sK0)
| a(sK2,sK3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
( ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X1,X0)
| ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3) )
& ( a(sK1,sK0)
| a(sK2,sK3) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
( ? [X4,X5] : a(X5,X4)
=> a(sK1,sK0) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
( ? [X6,X7] : a(X6,X7)
=> a(sK2,sK3) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ( ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X1,X0)
| ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X2,X3) )
& ( ? [X4,X5] : a(X5,X4)
| ? [X6,X7] : a(X6,X7) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ( ! [X2,X3] : ~ a(X3,X2)
| ! [X0,X1] : ~ a(X0,X1) )
& ( ? [X2,X3] : a(X3,X2)
| ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<~> ? [X2,X3] : a(X3,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
~ ( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X2,X3] : a(X3,X2) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X1,X0] : a(X0,X1) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ? [X0,X1] : a(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X1,X0] : a(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( spl4_1
| spl4_1 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f13,f13]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ a(X1,X0)
| ~ a(X2,X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN960+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:08:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.72/0.90 % (11965)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11963)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11964)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11966)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11968)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11969)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11970)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11963)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11964)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11968)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11966)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11965)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)First to succeed.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11970)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11969)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-11962"
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.72/0.90 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.72/0.90 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)------------------------------
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.72/0.90
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Memory used [KB]: 975
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.72/0.90 % (11967)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.72/0.90 % (11962)Success in time 0.538 s
% 0.72/0.90 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------