TSTP Solution File: SYN954+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN954+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:33:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.61s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 75 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 80 ( 28 ~; 23 |; 17 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 4 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 21 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f35,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f20,f30,f32,f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
( spl2_2
| ~ spl2_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f33]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
( $false
| spl2_2
| ~ spl2_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( ! [X2] : p(X2)
| ~ spl2_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( spl2_3
<=> ! [X2] : p(X2) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( ~ p(sK1)
| spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( spl2_2
<=> p(sK1) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
( spl2_1
| ~ spl2_3 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f31]) ).
fof(f31,plain,
( $false
| spl2_1
| ~ spl2_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f23]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
( ~ p(sK0)
| spl2_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( spl2_1
<=> p(sK0) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
spl2_3,
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f29,f22]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X3] : p(X3),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X2] :
( q(X2)
| p(X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ! [X2] :
( ( ~ p(sK1)
& q(X2) )
| ( ~ p(sK0)
& p(X2) ) )
& ! [X3] :
( p(X3)
| ~ q(X3) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f4,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( ~ p(X1)
& q(X2) )
| ( ~ p(X0)
& p(X2) ) )
& ! [X3] :
( p(X3)
| ~ q(X3) ) )
=> ( ! [X2] :
( ( ~ p(sK1)
& q(X2) )
| ( ~ p(sK0)
& p(X2) ) )
& ! [X3] :
( p(X3)
| ~ q(X3) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( ~ p(X1)
& q(X2) )
| ( ~ p(X0)
& p(X2) ) )
& ! [X3] :
( p(X3)
| ~ q(X3) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( ! [X3] :
( ( ~ p(X1)
& q(X3) )
| ( ~ p(X0)
& p(X3) ) )
& ! [X2] :
( p(X2)
| ~ q(X2) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( q(X2)
=> p(X2) )
=> ? [X3] :
( ( q(X3)
=> p(X1) )
& ( p(X3)
=> p(X0) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( q(X2)
=> p(X2) )
=> ? [X3] :
( ( q(X3)
=> p(X1) )
& ( p(X3)
=> p(X0) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X3] :
( p(X3)
| ~ q(X3) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f20,plain,
( ~ spl2_1
| ~ spl2_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f17,f13]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
( ~ p(sK1)
| ~ p(sK0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN954+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:16:37 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.81 % (1599)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1600)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1602)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1603)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1604)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1597)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1598)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1600)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1602)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1604)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1599)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1603)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1597)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1596"
% 0.61/0.81 % (1598)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.81 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.61/0.81 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.81
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Memory used [KB]: 978
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.61/0.81 % (1601)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.61/0.81 % (1596)Success in time 0.433 s
% 0.61/0.82 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------