TSTP Solution File: SYN951+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.54s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( b
| ~ p(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zhmtwm4/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ b
| ~ p(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zhmtwm4/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
p(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2zhmtwm4/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( b
| ~ p(X1) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ b
| ~ p(X1) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p(esk1_0),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : SYN951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:29:04 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.54/2.20 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.54/2.20 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.54/2.20 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.54/2.20 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C18_F1_PI_AE_R8_CS_SP_S2S
% 7.54/2.20 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.54/2.20 #
% 7.54/2.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.54/2.20
% 7.54/2.20 # Proof found!
% 7.54/2.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.54/2.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.54/2.20 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.54/2.20
% 7.54/2.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.54/2.20 # User time : 0.024 s
% 7.54/2.20 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.54/2.20 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.54/2.20 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.54/2.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------