TSTP Solution File: SYN949+1 by PyRes---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:49:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed May  8 20:26:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.56  % Version:  1.5
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.20/0.56  fof(prove_this,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(![C]:(((((s(A)&s(B))&r(B,C))&(![X]:(s(X)=>p(X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>q(X,Y)))))=>(?[X]:(?[Y]:(p(X)&q(X,Y)))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_this)).
% 0.20/0.56  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(![C]:(((((s(A)&s(B))&r(B,C))&(![X]:(s(X)=>p(X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>q(X,Y)))))=>(?[X]:(?[Y]:(p(X)&q(X,Y))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this])).
% 0.20/0.56  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:(?[C]:(((((s(A)&s(B))&r(B,C))&(![X]:(~s(X)|p(X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|q(X,Y)))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(~p(X)|~q(X,Y)))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.20/0.56  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,((((?[A]:(?[B]:((s(A)&s(B))&(?[C]:r(B,C)))))&(![X]:(~s(X)|p(X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|q(X,Y)))))&(![X]:(~p(X)|(![Y]:~q(X,Y))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.20/0.56  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((((?[X2]:(?[X3]:((s(X2)&s(X3))&(?[X4]:r(X3,X4)))))&(![X5]:(~s(X5)|p(X5))))&(![X6]:(![X7]:(~r(X6,X7)|q(X6,X7)))))&(![X8]:(~p(X8)|(![X9]:~q(X8,X9))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.20/0.56  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(((((s(skolem0001)&s(skolem0002))&r(skolem0002,skolem0003))&(~s(X5)|p(X5)))&(~r(X6,X7)|q(X6,X7)))&(~p(X8)|~q(X8,X9)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((((s(skolem0001)&s(skolem0002))&r(skolem0002,skolem0003))&(![X5]:(~s(X5)|p(X5))))&(![X6]:(![X7]:(~r(X6,X7)|q(X6,X7)))))&(![X8]:(~p(X8)|(![X9]:~q(X8,X9))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,s(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,~s(X10)|p(X10),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c13,plain,p(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9, c7])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,r(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,~r(X11,X12)|q(X11,X12),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c14,plain,q(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c10, c8])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,~p(X14)|~q(X14,X13),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c15,plain,~p(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c11, c14])).
% 0.20/0.56  cnf(c16,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c15, c13])).
% 0.20/0.56  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.20/0.56  
% 0.20/0.56  % Initial clauses    : 6
% 0.20/0.56  % Processed clauses  : 10
% 0.20/0.56  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Resolvents computed: 5
% 0.20/0.56  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.20/0.56  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.20/0.56  % User time          : 0.194 s
% 0.20/0.56  % System time        : 0.019 s
% 0.20/0.56  % Total time         : 0.213 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------