TSTP Solution File: SYN943+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN943+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.70s 2.25s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 6 unt; 5 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ c(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| c(f(X1))
| ~ e(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1)
| ~ s(esk1_0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| s(X1,f(X1))
| ~ e(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
e(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ g(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
p(esk1_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-365hk0m3/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ c(X1) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| c(f(X1))
| ~ e(X1) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1)
| ~ s(esk1_0,X1) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| s(X1,f(X1))
| ~ e(X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
e(esk1_0),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( g(X1)
| ~ e(X1)
| ~ p(f(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( g(esk1_0)
| p(f(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ g(X1) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
g(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p(esk1_0),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN943+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 11:54:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.70/2.25 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.70/2.25 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.70/2.25 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.70/2.25 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_____0003_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 7.70/2.25 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.70/2.25 #
% 7.70/2.25 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.70/2.25
% 7.70/2.25 # Proof found!
% 7.70/2.25 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.70/2.25 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.70/2.25 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.70/2.25
% 7.70/2.25 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.70/2.25 # User time : 0.026 s
% 7.70/2.25 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.70/2.25 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.70/2.25 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.70/2.25
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------