TSTP Solution File: SYN942+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN942+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:33:07 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.71s 0.88s
% Output : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 64 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 78 ( 29 ~; 19 |; 20 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 17 !; 7 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f10]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
a(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ c(X0)
| ~ a(X0) )
& ~ b(sK0)
& a(sK0)
& ! [X2] :
( c(X2)
| b(X2)
| ~ a(X2) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f6,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( ~ b(X1)
& a(X1) )
=> ( ~ b(sK0)
& a(sK0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ! [X0] :
( ~ c(X0)
| ~ a(X0) )
& ? [X1] :
( ~ b(X1)
& a(X1) )
& ! [X2] :
( c(X2)
| b(X2)
| ~ a(X2) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ! [X2] :
( ~ c(X2)
| ~ a(X2) )
& ? [X0] :
( ~ b(X0)
& a(X0) )
& ! [X1] :
( c(X1)
| b(X1)
| ~ a(X1) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ! [X2] :
( ~ c(X2)
| ~ a(X2) )
& ? [X0] :
( ~ b(X0)
& a(X0) )
& ! [X1] :
( c(X1)
| b(X1)
| ~ a(X1) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
~ ( ( ~ ! [X0] :
( a(X0)
=> b(X0) )
& ! [X1] :
( a(X1)
=> ( c(X1)
| b(X1) ) ) )
=> ? [X2] :
( c(X2)
& a(X2) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ~ ! [X0] :
( a(X0)
=> b(X0) )
& ! [X0] :
( a(X0)
=> ( c(X0)
| b(X0) ) ) )
=> ? [X0] :
( c(X0)
& a(X0) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ( ~ ! [X0] :
( a(X0)
=> b(X0) )
& ! [X0] :
( a(X0)
=> ( c(X0)
| b(X0) ) ) )
=> ? [X0] :
( c(X0)
& a(X0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f14,plain,
~ a(sK0),
inference(resolution,[],[f13,f11]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
~ b(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X2] :
( b(X2)
| ~ a(X2) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f9,f12]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ c(X0)
| ~ a(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X2] :
( c(X2)
| b(X2)
| ~ a(X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SYN942+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:00:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.87 % (14279)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14278)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14276)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14281)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14277)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14280)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14282)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.71/0.87 % (14283)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.71/0.88 % (14281)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14282)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14278)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14279)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14283)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)First to succeed.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14277)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-14275"
% 0.71/0.88 % (14280)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.71/0.88 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.71/0.88 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)------------------------------
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.71/0.88
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Memory used [KB]: 969
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.71/0.88 % (14276)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.71/0.88 % (14275)Success in time 0.507 s
% 0.71/0.88 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------