TSTP Solution File: SYN937+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN937+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.33s 2.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 4 unt; 2 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( c
| ~ p(X1)
| ~ p(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k0gppj/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k0gppj/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( p(esk1_0)
| p(esk2_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k0gppj/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( c
| ~ p(X1)
| ~ p(X2) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c,
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ p(X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p(esk1_0)
| p(esk2_0) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : SYN937+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:41:23 EDT 2022
% 0.21/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.33/2.55 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.33/2.55 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.33/2.55 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.33/2.55 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 8.33/2.55 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.33/2.55 #
% 8.33/2.55 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 8.33/2.55 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.33/2.55
% 8.33/2.55 # Proof found!
% 8.33/2.55 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.33/2.55 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.33/2.55 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.33/2.55
% 8.33/2.55 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.33/2.55 # User time : 0.025 s
% 8.33/2.55 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.33/2.55 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 8.33/2.55 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.33/2.55
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------