TSTP Solution File: SYN937+1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN937+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 02:13:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.41s 3.65s
% Output   : Proof 3.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN937+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 17:36:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.41/3.65  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/3.65  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Iff (∀ (X : Iota), p X → c) ((Exists fun X => p X) → c))) True
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Not (Iff (∀ (X : Iota), p X → c) (Exists p → c))) True
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Iff (∀ (X : Iota), p X → c) (Exists p → c)) False
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), p X → c) False) (Eq (Exists p → c) False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), p X → c) True) (Eq (Exists p → c) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p → c) False) (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 0 a) → c)) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 0 a) → c)) True) (Eq (Exists p) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 0 a) → c)) True) (Eq c False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a) → c) False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a) → c) False) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a_1)) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #12 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq c False) (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a) → c) False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #14 (by clausification #[12]): Or (Eq c False) (Eq c False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #15 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[14]): Eq c False
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #17 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p → c) True) (Eq (p a → c) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p a → c) True) (Or (Eq (Exists p) False) (Eq c True))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p) False) (Or (Eq c True) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq c True)))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq c True) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Or (Eq c True) (Eq (p a_1) False)))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #21 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq c True) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #22 (by forward demodulation #[21, 15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #25 (by superposition #[23, 10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a) False) (Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #27 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #29 (by superposition #[27, 10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #33 (by clausification #[29]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #37 (by equality factoring #[33]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Ne True True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #38 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False))
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #40 (by clausification #[38]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #41 (by clausification #[40]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #42 (by superposition #[41, 23]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (p a) False)
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #44 (by clausification #[42]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p a) False
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #45 (by superposition #[44, 41]): Eq False True
% 3.41/3.65  Clause #46 (by clausification #[45]): False
% 3.41/3.65  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------