TSTP Solution File: SYN936+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SYN936+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:29:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 2.79s 1.13s
% Output : Proof 3.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN936+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:27:10 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.61 ________ _____
% 0.20/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.20/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.20/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.61 (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.61 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.61
% 0.20/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 1.84/0.96 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/0.96 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/1.01 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/1.01 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/1.01 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/1.01 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.84/1.01 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.39/1.05 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.39/1.05 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.39/1.05 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.39/1.06 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 2.39/1.06 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 2.39/1.06 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 2.39/1.06 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 2.79/1.13 Prover 2: proved (491ms)
% 2.79/1.13
% 2.79/1.13 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.79/1.13
% 2.79/1.13 Prover 6: stopped
% 2.79/1.13 Prover 5: stopped
% 2.79/1.13 Prover 0: stopped
% 2.79/1.13 Prover 3: stopped
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 2.79/1.14 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.29/1.16 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.29/1.16 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.29/1.16 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 4: Found proof (size 11)
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 4: proved (532ms)
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 1: stopped
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 8: stopped
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 10: stopped
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.34/1.17 Prover 11: stopped
% 3.34/1.18 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.34/1.18 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.34/1.18 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.34/1.18 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.34/1.18 Prover 13: stopped
% 3.34/1.18 Prover 7: stopped
% 3.34/1.18
% 3.34/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.18
% 3.34/1.18 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.34/1.19 Assumptions after simplification:
% 3.34/1.19 ---------------------------------
% 3.34/1.19
% 3.34/1.19 (prove_this)
% 3.49/1.23 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: int] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: int] : ($i(v2) & $i(v0) &
% 3.49/1.23 (( ~ (v3 = 0) & p(v2) = v3 & c & ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | ~
% 3.49/1.23 (p(v4) = v5) | ~ $i(v4))) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) & p(v0) = v1 & c & ! [v4:
% 3.49/1.23 $i] : ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | ~ (p(v4) = v5) | ~ $i(v4)))))
% 3.49/1.23
% 3.49/1.23 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 3.49/1.23 ---------------------------------
% 3.49/1.23
% 3.49/1.23 Begin of proof
% 3.49/1.23 |
% 3.49/1.23 | DELTA: instantiating (prove_this) with fresh symbols all_3_0, all_3_1,
% 3.49/1.23 | all_3_2, all_3_3 gives:
% 3.49/1.23 | (1) $i(all_3_1) & $i(all_3_3) & (( ~ (all_3_0 = 0) & p(all_3_1) = all_3_0 &
% 3.49/1.23 | c & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~
% 3.49/1.23 | $i(v0))) | ( ~ (all_3_2 = 0) & p(all_3_3) = all_3_2 & c & ! [v0:
% 3.49/1.23 | $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))))
% 3.58/1.23 |
% 3.58/1.23 | ALPHA: (1) implies:
% 3.58/1.24 | (2) $i(all_3_3)
% 3.58/1.24 | (3) $i(all_3_1)
% 3.58/1.24 | (4) ( ~ (all_3_0 = 0) & p(all_3_1) = all_3_0 & c & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1:
% 3.58/1.24 | int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))) | ( ~ (all_3_2 = 0)
% 3.58/1.24 | & p(all_3_3) = all_3_2 & c & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |
% 3.58/1.24 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0)))
% 3.58/1.24 |
% 3.58/1.24 | BETA: splitting (4) gives:
% 3.58/1.24 |
% 3.58/1.24 | Case 1:
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | (5) ~ (all_3_0 = 0) & p(all_3_1) = all_3_0 & c & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1:
% 3.58/1.24 | | int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 3.58/1.24 | | (6) ~ (all_3_0 = 0)
% 3.58/1.24 | | (7) p(all_3_1) = all_3_0
% 3.58/1.24 | | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_3_1, all_3_0, simplifying with (3),
% 3.58/1.24 | | (7) gives:
% 3.58/1.24 | | (9) all_3_0 = 0
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | REDUCE: (6), (9) imply:
% 3.58/1.24 | | (10) $false
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | CLOSE: (10) is inconsistent.
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | Case 2:
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | (11) ~ (all_3_2 = 0) & p(all_3_3) = all_3_2 & c & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1:
% 3.58/1.24 | | int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 3.58/1.24 | |
% 3.58/1.24 | | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 3.58/1.25 | | (12) ~ (all_3_2 = 0)
% 3.58/1.25 | | (13) p(all_3_3) = all_3_2
% 3.58/1.25 | | (14) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0))
% 3.58/1.25 | |
% 3.58/1.25 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (14) with all_3_3, all_3_2, simplifying with (2),
% 3.58/1.25 | | (13) gives:
% 3.58/1.25 | | (15) all_3_2 = 0
% 3.58/1.25 | |
% 3.58/1.25 | | REDUCE: (12), (15) imply:
% 3.58/1.25 | | (16) $false
% 3.58/1.25 | |
% 3.58/1.25 | | CLOSE: (16) is inconsistent.
% 3.58/1.25 | |
% 3.58/1.25 | End of split
% 3.58/1.25 |
% 3.58/1.25 End of proof
% 3.58/1.25 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 3.58/1.25
% 3.58/1.25 634ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------