TSTP Solution File: SYN936+1 by Goeland---1.0.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN936+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:25:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.34s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SYN936+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 09:31:47 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.14/0.34  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.14/0.34  [0.000035s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  Start search
% 0.14/0.34  nb_step : 1 - limit : 2
% 0.14/0.34  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.14/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  [0] BETA_NOT_EQUIV : ~(! [X1_1] :  ((c => p(X1_1))) <=> (c => ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [1] ~! [X1_1] :  ((c => p(X1_1))), (c => ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [2] ! [X1_1] :  ((c => p(X1_1))), ~(c => ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)))
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [1] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X1_1] :  ((c => p(X1_1)))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [4] ~(c => p(skolem_X11))
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [4] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(c => p(skolem_X11))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [5] c, ~p(skolem_X11)
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [5] BETA_IMPLY : (c => ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [7] ~c
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [8] ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [7] CLOSURE : ~c
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [8] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [12] p(X2_0_0)
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [12] CLOSURE : p(X2_0_0)
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [2] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(c => ! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [3] c, ~! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [3] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [6] ~p(skolem_X22)
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [6] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X1_1] :  ((c => p(X1_1)))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [9] (c => p(skolem_X22))
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [9] BETA_IMPLY : (c => p(skolem_X22))
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [10] ~c
% 0.14/0.34  	-> [11] p(skolem_X22)
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [10] CLOSURE : ~c
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  [11] CLOSURE : p(skolem_X22)
% 0.14/0.34  
% 0.14/0.34  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  [0.004356s][1][Res] 9 goroutines created
% 0.14/0.34  ==== Result ====
% 0.14/0.34  [0.004386s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.14/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------