TSTP Solution File: SYN935+1 by JavaRes---1.3.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : JavaRes---1.3.0
% Problem : SYN935+1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xmx15G -cp /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin atp.ProverFOF -i /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark --eqax --proof --forward-subsumption --backward_subsumption --delete-tautologies --timeout 0 %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 18:31:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.59s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SYN935+1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : java -Xmx15G -cp /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin atp.ProverFOF -i /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark --eqax --proof --forward-subsumption --backward_subsumption --delete-tautologies --timeout 0 %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUModel : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % RAMPerCPU : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Mar 10 17:52:34 EST 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 # Using default include path : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark
% 0.21/0.49 # INFO in ProverFOF.main(): Processing file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): filename: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): opts: {backward_subsumption=true, delete-tautologies=true, filename=/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p, forward-subsumption=true, proof=true, eqax=true, timeout=0}
% 0.21/0.49 # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): evals: [Heuristics: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval] litSelect: LARGEST indexing: true delTaut: true forSub: true backSub: true]
% 0.21/0.54 # hasConjecture: true isFOF: true
% 0.21/0.54 # ProofState(): heuristics: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval]
% 0.21/0.54 # HeuristicsClauseSet using eval functions: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval]
% 0.59/0.57 # -----------------
% 0.59/0.57 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.57
% 0.59/0.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.57 fof(prove_this,conjecture,((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c)),input).
% 0.59/0.57 fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.59/0.57 fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.59/0.57 fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(p(X)&~c))|((![X]:p(X))&~c))&((?[X]:(~p(X)|c))|((?[X]:~p(X))|c))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.59/0.57 fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((?[VAR2]:(~p(VAR2)|c))|((?[VAR3]:~p(VAR3))|c))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((p(VAR0)&~c)|(p(VAR1)&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f9,negated_conjecture,((((p(VAR0)|p(VAR1))&(p(VAR0)|~c))&((~c|p(VAR1))&(~c|~c)))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(distribute, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(cnf3,negated_conjecture,~c|~c,inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f9])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(c0,plain,~c,inference(factor, status(thm), [cnf3])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(prove_this,conjecture,((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c)),input).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(p(X)&~c))|((![X]:p(X))&~c))&((?[X]:(~p(X)|c))|((?[X]:~p(X))|c))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((?[VAR2]:(~p(VAR2)|c))|((?[VAR3]:~p(VAR3))|c))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((p(VAR0)&~c)|(p(VAR1)&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f9,negated_conjecture,((((p(VAR0)|p(VAR1))&(p(VAR0)|~c))&((~c|p(VAR1))&(~c|~c)))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(distribute, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(cnf0,negated_conjecture,p(X3)|p(X4),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f9])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(c1,plain,p(X5),inference(factor, status(thm), [cnf0])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(prove_this,conjecture,((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c)),input).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(p(X)&~c))|((![X]:p(X))&~c))&((?[X]:(~p(X)|c))|((?[X]:~p(X))|c))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((?[VAR2]:(~p(VAR2)|c))|((?[VAR3]:~p(VAR3))|c))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((p(VAR0)&~c)|(p(VAR1)&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f9,negated_conjecture,((((p(VAR0)|p(VAR1))&(p(VAR0)|~c))&((~c|p(VAR1))&(~c|~c)))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(distribute, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(cnf4,negated_conjecture,~p(skf4)|c|~p(skf5)|c,inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f9])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(prove_this,conjecture,((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c)),input).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~((?[X]:(p(X)=>c))<=>((![X]:p(X))=>c))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(p(X)&~c))|((![X]:p(X))&~c))&((?[X]:(~p(X)|c))|((?[X]:~p(X))|c))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((?[VAR2]:(~p(VAR2)|c))|((?[VAR3]:~p(VAR3))|c))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR0]:(p(VAR0)&~c))|((![VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((p(VAR0)&~c)|(p(VAR1)&~c))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.59/0.58 fof(f9,negated_conjecture,((((p(VAR0)|p(VAR1))&(p(VAR0)|~c))&((~c|p(VAR1))&(~c|~c)))&((~p(skf4)|c)|(~p(skf5)|c))),inference(distribute, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(cnf0,negated_conjecture,p(X3)|p(X4),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f9])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(c1,plain,p(X5),inference(factor, status(thm), [cnf0])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(c4,plain,~p(skf4)|c,inference(resolution, status(thm), [c1, cnf4])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(c5,plain,c,inference(resolution, status(thm), [c4, c1])).
% 0.59/0.58 cnf(c8,plain,$false,inference(resolution, status(thm), [c5, c0])).
% 0.59/0.58 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.58 # Filename : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.58 # Indexed : true
% 0.59/0.58 # Eval function name : PickGiven5
% 0.59/0.58 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.59/0.58 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.59/0.58 # Factors computed : 2
% 0.59/0.58 # Resolvents computed: 7
% 0.59/0.58 # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.59/0.58 # Forward subsumed : 2
% 0.59/0.58 # Backward subsumed : 5
% 0.59/0.58 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.58 # SZS Expected : Theorem
% 0.59/0.58 # time : 33ms
% 0.59/0.58
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------