TSTP Solution File: SYN934+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN934+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:58:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.40s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 4 unt; 3 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 16 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( p(esk1_0)
| p(esk2_0)
| ~ c ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezz8vplc/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezz8vplc/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ p(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ezz8vplc/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p(esk1_0)
| p(esk2_0)
| ~ c ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c,
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ p(X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p(esk2_0)
| p(esk1_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN934+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:14:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.40/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.40/2.34 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.40/2.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.40/2.34 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 7.40/2.34 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.40/2.34 #
% 7.40/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.40/2.34
% 7.40/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.40/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.40/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.40/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.40/2.34
% 7.40/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.40/2.34 # User time : 0.022 s
% 7.40/2.34 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.40/2.34 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.40/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.40/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------