TSTP Solution File: SYN934+1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN934+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 02:13:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.47s 3.80s
% Output   : Proof 3.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN934+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 19:36:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.47/3.80  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/3.80  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Iff (Exists fun X => c → p X) (c → Exists fun X => p X))) True
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Not (Iff (Exists fun X => c → p X) (c → Exists p))) True
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Iff (Exists fun X => c → p X) (c → Exists p)) False
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq (Exists fun X => c → p X) False) (Eq (c → Exists p) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq (Exists fun X => c → p X) True) (Eq (c → Exists p) True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (c → Exists p) False) (Eq (c → p a) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (c → p a) False) (Eq c True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (c → p a) False) (Eq (Exists p) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): Or (Eq c True) (Eq c True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #10 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[8]): Eq c True
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #13 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p) False) (Eq (p a) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #15 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (c → Exists p) True) (Eq (c → p (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (c → p (skS.0 0 a)) True) (Or (Eq c False) (Eq (Exists p) True))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq (Exists p) True) (Or (Eq c False) (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True)))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True)))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #19 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #20 (by forward demodulation #[19, 10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #22 (by superposition #[21, 14]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (p a_1) False))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #24 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Eq (p a_1) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #25 (by superposition #[24, 21]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Or (Eq False True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #31 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #34 (by equality factoring #[31]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Ne True True) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False))
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #37 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #38 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) True
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #39 (by superposition #[38, 14]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (p a) False)
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #41 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p a) False
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #42 (by superposition #[41, 38]): Eq False True
% 3.47/3.80  Clause #43 (by clausification #[42]): False
% 3.47/3.80  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------