TSTP Solution File: SYN930+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN930+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:49:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.35s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN930+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed May 8 20:24:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.35/0.53 % Version: 1.5
% 0.35/0.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.35/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.35/0.53 fof(prove_this,conjecture,((![X]:(p(X)|c))<=>((![X]:p(X))|c)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_this)).
% 0.35/0.53 fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X]:(p(X)|c))<=>((![X]:p(X))|c))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this])).
% 0.35/0.53 fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(((?[X]:(~p(X)&~c))|((?[X]:~p(X))&~c))&((![X]:(p(X)|c))|((![X]:p(X))|c))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.35/0.53 fof(c2,negated_conjecture,((((?[X]:~p(X))&~c)|((?[X]:~p(X))&~c))&(((![X]:p(X))|c)|((![X]:p(X))|c))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.35/0.53 fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((((?[X2]:~p(X2))&~c)|((?[X3]:~p(X3))&~c))&(((![X4]:p(X4))|c)|((![X5]:p(X5))|c))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.35/0.53 fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X4]:(![X5]:(((~p(skolem0001)&~c)|(~p(skolem0002)&~c))&((p(X4)|c)|(p(X5)|c))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((~p(skolem0001)&~c)|(~p(skolem0002)&~c))&(((![X4]:p(X4))|c)|((![X5]:p(X5))|c))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).])).
% 0.35/0.53 fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(![X4]:(![X5]:((((~p(skolem0001)|~p(skolem0002))&(~p(skolem0001)|~c))&((~c|~p(skolem0002))&(~c|~c)))&((p(X4)|c)|(p(X5)|c))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,~c|~c,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c12,plain,~c,inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,p(X6)|c|p(X7)|c,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c13,plain,p(X8)|c,inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c11])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c20,plain,p(X9),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c13, c12])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,~p(skolem0001)|~p(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c21,plain,~p(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c20, c7])).
% 0.35/0.53 cnf(c22,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c21, c20])).
% 0.35/0.53 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.35/0.53
% 0.35/0.53 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.35/0.53 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.35/0.53 % Factors computed : 3
% 0.35/0.53 % Resolvents computed: 8
% 0.35/0.53 % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.35/0.53 % Forward subsumed : 2
% 0.35/0.53 % Backward subsumed : 4
% 0.35/0.53 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.35/0.53 % User time : 0.156 s
% 0.35/0.53 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.35/0.53 % Total time : 0.172 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------