TSTP Solution File: SYN925+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN925+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:33:36 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.76s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
? [X0] :
( p(X0)
=> ! [X1] : p(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
( p(X0)
=> ! [X1] : p(X1) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
! [X0] :
( ? [X1] : ~ p(X1)
& p(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ? [X1] : ~ p(X1)
=> ~ p(sK0) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ p(sK0)
& p(X0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f3,f4]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X0] : p(X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
~ p(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ p(sK0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
p(X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
p(sK0),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_51]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SYN925+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 20:55:35 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.76/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.76/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.76/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 ------ Parsing...
% 0.76/1.18 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 ------ Preprocessing...
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.76/1.18
% 0.76/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------