TSTP Solution File: SYN924+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN924+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:24:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SYN924+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 09:32:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34 [0.000037s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 Start search
% 0.12/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.12/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0] BETA_NOT_EQUIV : ~(? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) | q(X1_1))) <=> (? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) | ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3))))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [1] ~? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) | q(X1_1))), (? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) | ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [2] ? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) | q(X1_1))), ~(? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) | ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3)))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [2] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) | ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [3] ~? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)), ~? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [3] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) | q(X1_1)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [6] (p(skolem_X11) | q(skolem_X11))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [6] BETA_OR : (p(skolem_X11) | q(skolem_X11))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [7] p(skolem_X11)
% 0.12/0.35 -> [8] q(skolem_X11)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [7] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [14] ~p(X2_1_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [14] CLOSURE : ~p(X2_1_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [8] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [12] ~p(X2_0_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [12] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [16] ~q(X3_0_1)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [16] CLOSURE : ~q(X3_0_1)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [1] BETA_OR : (? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2)) | ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [4] ? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [5] ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [5] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X3_3] : (q(X3_3))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [9] q(skolem_X33)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [9] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) | q(X1_1)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [11] ~(p(X1_0_0) | q(X1_0_0))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [11] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(p(X1_0_0) | q(X1_0_0))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [13] ~p(X1_0_0), ~q(X1_0_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [13] CLOSURE : ~q(X1_0_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [4] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X2_2] : (p(X2_2))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [10] p(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [10] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X1_1] : ((p(X1_1) | q(X1_1)))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [15] ~(p(X1_1_0) | q(X1_1_0))
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [15] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(p(X1_1_0) | q(X1_1_0))
% 0.12/0.35 -> [17] ~p(X1_1_0), ~q(X1_1_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 [17] CLOSURE : ~p(X1_1_0)
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.35 [0.006746s][1][Res] 7 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.35 ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.35 [0.006797s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------