TSTP Solution File: SYN922+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN922+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:30:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 33 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 11 ~; 13 |; 8 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 6 sgn 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
( p(X1)
& q(X1) )
<=> ( ! [X1] : p(X1)
& ! [X1] : q(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SECp9Wh0tr/E---3.1_1355.p',prove_this) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] :
( p(X1)
& q(X1) )
<=> ( ! [X1] : p(X1)
& ! [X1] : q(X1) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ p(esk1_0)
| ~ q(esk1_0)
| ~ p(esk2_0)
| ~ q(esk3_0) )
& ( p(X6)
| p(X5) )
& ( q(X7)
| p(X5) )
& ( p(X6)
| q(X5) )
& ( q(X7)
| q(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1)
| p(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(esk1_0)
| ~ q(esk1_0)
| ~ p(esk2_0)
| ~ q(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
p(X1),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(esk1_0)
| ~ q(esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1)
| q(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
q(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN922+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 10:45:57 EDT 2024
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SECp9Wh0tr/E---3.1_1355.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # sh5l with pid 1435 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1442 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 11
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 7
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 4
% 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 356
% 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 89
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1596 pages
% 0.19/0.48
% 0.19/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------