TSTP Solution File: SYN801-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN801-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 299.06s 299.25s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN801-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 08:16:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.92/1.09 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.92/1.09 The process was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.92/1.09 Tue Jul 12 08:16:08 2022
% 0.92/1.09 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27084.
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.92/1.09 set(auto).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.92/1.09 clear(print_given).
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 list(usable).
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.92/1.09 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.92/1.09 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.92/1.09 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 ------------> process usable:
% 0.92/1.09 65 back subsumes 64.
% 0.92/1.09 72 back subsumes 70.
% 0.92/1.09 80 back subsumes 79.
% 0.92/1.09 88 back subsumes 78.
% 0.92/1.09 156 back subsumes 141.
% 0.92/1.09 156 back subsumes 96.
% 0.92/1.09 156 back subsumes 95.
% 0.92/1.09 156 back subsumes 92.
% 0.92/1.09 156 back subsumes 86.
% 0.92/1.09 156 back subsumes 84.
% 0.92/1.09 157 back subsumes 83.
% 0.92/1.09 158 back subsumes 142.
% 0.92/1.09 174 back subsumes 171.
% 0.92/1.09 192 back subsumes 190.
% 0.92/1.09 195 back subsumes 192.
% 0.92/1.09 220 back subsumes 219.
% 0.92/1.09 248 back subsumes 129.
% 0.92/1.09 276 back subsumes 273.
% 0.92/1.09 309 back subsumes 308.
% 0.92/1.09 311 back subsumes 309.
% 0.92/1.09 339 back subsumes 291.
% 0.92/1.09 508 back subsumes 505.
% 0.92/1.09 548 back subsumes 541.
% 0.92/1.09 556 back subsumes 553.
% 0.92/1.09 557 back subsumes 93.
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 ------------> process sos:
% 0.92/1.09
% 0.92/1.09 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.92/1.14 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.92/1.14 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.92/1.14 number of clauses in intial UL: 565
% 0.92/1.14 number of clauses initially in problem: 567
% 0.92/1.14 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 0.92/1.14 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 71
% 0.92/1.14 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.92/1.14 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.92/1.14 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.92/1.14 distinct function count: 2
% 0.92/1.14 distinct constant count: 0
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.92/1.14
% 0.92/1.14 =========== start of search ===========
% 76.41/76.59
% 76.41/76.59
% 76.41/76.59 Changing weight limit from 60 to 44.
% 76.41/76.59
% 76.41/76.59 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 76.41/76.59
% 76.41/76.59 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 76.41/76.59
% 76.41/76.59 Resetting weight limit to 44 after 15 givens.
% 76.41/76.59
% 97.85/98.09
% 97.85/98.09
% 97.85/98.09 Changing weight limit from 44 to 42.
% 97.85/98.09
% 97.85/98.09 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 20 givens.
% 97.85/98.09
% 117.85/118.03
% 117.85/118.03
% 117.85/118.03 Changing weight limit from 42 to 40.
% 117.85/118.03
% 117.85/118.03 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 25 givens.
% 117.85/118.03
% 208.35/208.55
% 208.35/208.55
% 208.35/208.55 Changing weight limit from 40 to 37.
% 208.35/208.55
% 208.35/208.55 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 30 givens.
% 208.35/208.55
% 237.55/237.74
% 237.55/237.74
% 237.55/237.74 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 237.55/237.74
% 237.55/237.74 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 35 givens.
% 237.55/237.74
% 299.06/299.25
% 299.06/299.25
% 299.06/299.25 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 299.06/299.25
% 299.06/299.25 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 40 givens.
% 299.06/299.25
% 300.06/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------