TSTP Solution File: SYN799-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN799-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.07s 300.22s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SYN799-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:46:50 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.84/1.04 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.84/1.04 The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.84/1.04 Mon Jul 11 18:46:50 2022
% 0.84/1.04 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28082.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.84/1.04 set(auto).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.84/1.04 clear(print_given).
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 list(usable).
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.84/1.04 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.84/1.04 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.84/1.04 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 ------------> process usable:
% 0.84/1.04 59 back subsumes 58.
% 0.84/1.04 73 back subsumes 72.
% 0.84/1.04 100 back subsumes 76.
% 0.84/1.04 100 back subsumes 75.
% 0.84/1.04 123 back subsumes 122.
% 0.84/1.04 125 back subsumes 123.
% 0.84/1.04 178 back subsumes 152.
% 0.84/1.04 178 back subsumes 148.
% 0.84/1.04 178 back subsumes 143.
% 0.84/1.04 180 back subsumes 87.
% 0.84/1.04 202 back subsumes 199.
% 0.84/1.04 218 back subsumes 151.
% 0.84/1.04 218 back subsumes 142.
% 0.84/1.04 219 back subsumes 145.
% 0.84/1.04 219 back subsumes 144.
% 0.84/1.04 228 back subsumes 127.
% 0.84/1.04 235 back subsumes 234.
% 0.84/1.04 237 back subsumes 198.
% 0.84/1.04 237 back subsumes 83.
% 0.84/1.04 264 back subsumes 257.
% 0.84/1.04 318 back subsumes 89.
% 0.84/1.04 361 back subsumes 69.
% 0.84/1.04 403 back subsumes 353.
% 0.84/1.04 463 back subsumes 459.
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 ------------> process sos:
% 0.84/1.04
% 0.84/1.04 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.90/1.09 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.90/1.09 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.90/1.09 number of clauses in intial UL: 529
% 0.90/1.09 number of clauses initially in problem: 531
% 0.90/1.09 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 0.90/1.09 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 71
% 0.90/1.09 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.90/1.09 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.90/1.09 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.90/1.09 distinct function count: 2
% 0.90/1.09 distinct constant count: 0
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.09
% 0.90/1.09 =========== start of search ===========
% 52.80/53.00
% 52.80/53.00
% 52.80/53.00 Changing weight limit from 60 to 51.
% 52.80/53.00
% 52.80/53.00 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 52.80/53.00
% 52.80/53.00 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 52.80/53.00
% 52.80/53.00 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 55 givens.
% 52.80/53.00
% 57.34/57.59
% 57.34/57.59
% 57.34/57.59 Changing weight limit from 51 to 49.
% 57.34/57.59
% 57.34/57.59 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 60 givens.
% 57.34/57.59
% 61.91/62.08
% 61.91/62.08
% 61.91/62.08 Changing weight limit from 49 to 48.
% 61.91/62.08
% 61.91/62.08 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 65 givens.
% 61.91/62.08
% 66.86/67.03
% 66.86/67.03
% 66.86/67.03 Changing weight limit from 48 to 45.
% 66.86/67.03
% 66.86/67.03 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 70 givens.
% 66.86/67.03
% 79.32/79.55
% 79.32/79.55
% 79.32/79.55 Changing weight limit from 45 to 42.
% 79.32/79.55
% 79.32/79.55 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 75 givens.
% 79.32/79.55
% 106.33/106.54
% 106.33/106.54
% 106.33/106.54 Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 106.33/106.54
% 106.33/106.54 Resetting weight limit to 41 after 80 givens.
% 106.33/106.54
% 119.44/119.61
% 119.44/119.61
% 119.44/119.61 Changing weight limit from 41 to 40.
% 119.44/119.61
% 119.44/119.61 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 85 givens.
% 119.44/119.61
% 131.54/131.80
% 131.54/131.80
% 131.54/131.80 Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 131.54/131.80
% 131.54/131.80 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 90 givens.
% 131.54/131.80
% 142.84/143.04
% 142.84/143.04
% 142.84/143.04 Changing weight limit from 39 to 38.
% 142.84/143.04
% 142.84/143.04 Resetting weight limit to 38 after 95 givens.
% 142.84/143.04
% 164.02/164.20
% 164.02/164.20
% 164.02/164.20 Changing weight limit from 38 to 37.
% 164.02/164.20
% 164.02/164.20 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 100 givens.
% 164.02/164.20
% 209.15/209.34
% 209.15/209.34
% 209.15/209.34 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 209.15/209.34
% 209.15/209.34 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 110 givens.
% 209.15/209.34
% 225.26/225.51
% 225.26/225.51
% 225.26/225.51 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 225.26/225.51
% 225.26/225.51 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 115 givens.
% 225.26/225.51
% 275.15/275.31
% 275.15/275.31
% 275.15/275.31 Changing weight limit from 35 to 36.
% 275.15/275.31
% 275.15/275.31 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 125 givens.
% 275.15/275.31
% 300.07/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------