TSTP Solution File: SYN795-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN795-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s 300.22s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN795-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:12:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.77/0.94  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.77/0.94  The process was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.77/0.94  Tue Jul 12 04:12:45 2022
% 0.77/0.94  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11322.
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.77/0.94  set(auto).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.77/0.94  clear(print_given).
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  list(usable).
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.77/0.94  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.77/0.94  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.77/0.94     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  ------------> process usable:
% 0.77/0.94  62 back subsumes 61.
% 0.77/0.94  72 back subsumes 71.
% 0.77/0.94  112 back subsumes 111.
% 0.77/0.94  114 back subsumes 112.
% 0.77/0.94  134 back subsumes 131.
% 0.77/0.94  134 back subsumes 84.
% 0.77/0.94  134 back subsumes 80.
% 0.77/0.94  134 back subsumes 56.
% 0.77/0.94  135 back subsumes 82.
% 0.77/0.94  147 back subsumes 145.
% 0.77/0.94  332 back subsumes 331.
% 0.77/0.94  363 back subsumes 352.
% 0.77/0.94  364 back subsumes 359.
% 0.77/0.94  388 back subsumes 387.
% 0.77/0.94  405 back subsumes 401.
% 0.77/0.94  416 back subsumes 415.
% 0.77/0.94  432 back subsumes 431.
% 0.77/0.94  453 back subsumes 447.
% 0.77/0.94  464 back subsumes 463.
% 0.77/0.94  501 back subsumes 497.
% 0.77/0.94  509 back subsumes 506.
% 0.77/0.94  522 back subsumes 521.
% 0.77/0.94  534 back subsumes 525.
% 0.77/0.94  537 back subsumes 535.
% 0.77/0.94  570 back subsumes 557.
% 0.77/0.94  575 back subsumes 565.
% 0.77/0.94  584 back subsumes 573.
% 0.77/0.94  585 back subsumes 580.
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  ------------> process sos:
% 0.77/0.94  
% 0.77/0.94  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.77/0.99  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.77/0.99  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.77/0.99  number of clauses in intial UL: 579
% 0.77/0.99  number of clauses initially in problem: 581
% 0.77/0.99  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 0.77/0.99  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.77/0.99  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.77/0.99  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.77/0.99     distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.77/0.99     distinct function count: 2
% 0.77/0.99     distinct constant count: 0
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/0.99  
% 0.77/0.99  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.02/300.22  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------