TSTP Solution File: SYN731-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : SYN731-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:35:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN731-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:32:47 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.38 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.38 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.21/0.38 fof(x2150_1, negated_conjecture, ![A, B]: p(A, B, sk1(B, A))).
% 0.21/0.38 fof(x2150_2, negated_conjecture, ![A2, B2]: ~p(A2, A2, B2)).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.21/0.38 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.21/0.38 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.21/0.38 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.21/0.38 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.21/0.38 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.21/0.38 variables of u and v.
% 0.21/0.38 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.21/0.38 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 Axiom 1 (x2150_1): p(X, Y, sk1(Y, X)) = true2.
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 Goal 1 (x2150_2): p(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.21/0.38 The goal is true when:
% 0.21/0.38 X = X
% 0.21/0.38 Y = sk1(X, X)
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 Proof:
% 0.21/0.38 p(X, X, sk1(X, X))
% 0.21/0.38 = { by axiom 1 (x2150_1) }
% 0.21/0.38 true2
% 0.21/0.38 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.38
% 0.21/0.38 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------