TSTP Solution File: SYN731-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN731-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:46 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.28s 1.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    2 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   2   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (;   8   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p > sk1 > #nlpp

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(p,type,
    p: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sk1,type,
    sk1: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : p(A,B,sk1(B,A)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ~ p(A,A,B),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_7,B_8] : p(A_7,B_8,sk1(B_8,A_7)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] : ~ p(A_3,A_3,B_4),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SYN731-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:17:47 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.28/1.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.28/1.56  
% 2.28/1.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.28/1.60  
% 2.28/1.60  Inference rules
% 2.28/1.60  ----------------------
% 2.28/1.60  #Ref     : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Sup     : 1
% 2.28/1.60  #Fact    : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Define  : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Split   : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Chain   : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Close   : 0
% 2.28/1.60  
% 2.28/1.60  Ordering : KBO
% 2.28/1.60  
% 2.28/1.60  Simplification rules
% 2.28/1.60  ----------------------
% 2.28/1.60  #Subsume      : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Demod        : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Tautology    : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 2.28/1.60  #BackRed      : 0
% 2.28/1.60  
% 2.28/1.60  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.28/1.60  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 2.28/1.60  
% 2.28/1.60  Timing (in seconds)
% 2.28/1.60  ----------------------
% 2.47/1.60  Preprocessing        : 0.37
% 2.47/1.60  Parsing              : 0.20
% 2.47/1.60  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 2.47/1.60  Main loop            : 0.10
% 2.47/1.60  Inferencing          : 0.05
% 2.47/1.60  Reduction            : 0.02
% 2.47/1.60  Demodulation         : 0.01
% 2.47/1.60  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 2.47/1.60  Subsumption          : 0.02
% 2.47/1.60  Abstraction          : 0.00
% 2.47/1.60  MUC search           : 0.00
% 2.47/1.60  Cooper               : 0.00
% 2.47/1.60  Total                : 0.52
% 2.47/1.60  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 2.47/1.60  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 2.47/1.60  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 2.47/1.60  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------