%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SYN730+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:56:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.75s 2.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   2 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,esk1_1(X1),k(esk1_1(X1)))
    | p(a,esk1_1(X1),h(esk1_1(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a2ztof12/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(X1,esk1_1(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-a2ztof12/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,esk1_1(X1),k(esk1_1(X1)))
    | p(a,esk1_1(X1),h(esk1_1(X1))) ),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(X1,esk1_1(X1),X2),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    p(a,esk1_1(X1),h(esk1_1(X1))),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN730+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 17:29:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.75/2.30  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.75/2.30  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.75/2.30  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.75/2.30  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_N___023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SE_S0Y
% 7.75/2.30  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.75/2.30  #
% 7.75/2.30  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 7.75/2.30  
% 7.75/2.30  # Proof found!
% 7.75/2.30  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.75/2.30  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.75/2.30  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.75/2.30  
% 7.75/2.30  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.75/2.30  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 7.75/2.30  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.75/2.30  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 7.75/2.30  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.75/2.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------