TSTP Solution File: SYN702-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN702-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:03 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.66s 3.85s
% Output : Refutation 3.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN702-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:39:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Mon Jul 11 15:39:58 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13546.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.20/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.20/0.36 in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 52
% 0.20/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 79
% 0.20/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 65
% 0.20/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 51
% 0.20/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 0.20/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 99
% 0.20/0.41 distinct predicate count: 26
% 0.20/0.41 distinct function count: 53
% 0.20/0.41 distinct constant count: 20
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41
% 0.20/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 -------- PROOF --------
% 3.66/3.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.66/3.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 2 [ 3 2 25162 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 3 [ 5 2 16656 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 4 [ 2 4 48962 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 5 [ 6 11 178974 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 6 [ 2 9 111904 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 7 [ 4 2 30129 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 8 [ 5 3 25562 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 9 [ 8 3 28057 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 3.47 sec ----> 97 [binary,96.1,26.1] {-} $F.
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.66/3.85 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.66/3.85 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 26 [] {+} -p47(f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,A),B),C),D),D).
% 3.66/3.85 27 [] {+} p47(A,B)| -p47(C,D)| -p7(D,B)| -p4(C,A).
% 3.66/3.85 32 [] {+} p4(f5(A,B),f5(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p3(B,D).
% 3.66/3.85 48 [] {+} p47(A,B)| -p47(f5(c48,f13(f16(f18(c50,A),C),D)),B).
% 3.66/3.85 55 [] {-} p7(A,A).
% 3.66/3.85 72 [] {+} p2(A,A).
% 3.66/3.85 78 [] {-} p47(f5(c48,f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54)),c54).
% 3.66/3.85 79 [] {+} p3(f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,A),B),C)),D),f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,A),B),C),D)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,A),B),C),D)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,A),B),C),D))).
% 3.66/3.85 85 [hyper,79,32,72] {+} p4(f5(A,f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,B),C),D)),E)),f5(A,f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,B),C),D),E)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,B),C),D),E)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,B),C),D),E)))).
% 3.66/3.85 94 [hyper,85,27,78,55] {-} p47(f5(c48,f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54))),c54).
% 3.66/3.85 96 [hyper,94,48] {-} p47(f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54),c54).
% 3.66/3.85 97 [binary,96.1,26.1] {-} $F.
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.66/3.85 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 ============ end of search ============
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 true clauses given 6 (17.1%)
% 3.66/3.85 false clauses given 29
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 FALSE TRUE
% 3.66/3.85 47 0 3
% 3.66/3.85 51 0 4
% 3.66/3.85 tot: 0 7 (100.0% true)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Model 9 [ 8 -16 28057 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.66/3.85
% 3.66/3.85 Process 13546 finished Mon Jul 11 15:40:01 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------