TSTP Solution File: SYN696-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN696-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:47:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.15s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_42,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_42) ).
cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_12) ).
cnf(p2_55,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_55) ).
cnf(not_p2_56,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c45),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_56) ).
cnf(p2_61,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4))
| ~ p10(X2,X4)
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_61) ).
cnf(p3_36,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))
| ~ p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_36) ).
cnf(p2_16,negated_conjecture,
p2(c44,c45),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_16) ).
cnf(p10_7,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_7) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_12 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)),
p2_55 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c45),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p2_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4))
| ~ p10(X2,X4)
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))
| ~ p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p3_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c45),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43))
| ~ p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4))
| ~ p10(X2,X4)
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))
| ~ p2(X1,X2) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(c45),c43)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),X2),f11(f4(X3),X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p10(X2,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
p2(c44,c45),
p2_16 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
p10_7 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN696-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:53:07 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/0.60 # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.15/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.15/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 6764 completed with status 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.15/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.15/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.15/0.60 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.15/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 6769 completed with status 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 1.15/0.60 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.15/0.60 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # No SInE strategy applied
% 1.15/0.60 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.15/0.60 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.60 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 1.15/0.60 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.15/0.60
% 1.15/0.60 # Proof found!
% 1.15/0.60 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.15/0.60 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.15/0.60 # Parsed axioms : 73
% 1.15/0.60 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Initial clauses : 73
% 1.15/0.60 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Initial clauses in saturation : 73
% 1.15/0.60 # Processed clauses : 1031
% 1.15/0.60 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # ...subsumed : 294
% 1.15/0.60 # ...remaining for further processing : 737
% 1.15/0.60 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Backward-subsumed : 26
% 1.15/0.60 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Generated clauses : 2859
% 1.15/0.60 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2725
% 1.15/0.60 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 1.15/0.60 # Paramodulations : 2859
% 1.15/0.60 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # NegExts : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Total rewrite steps : 203
% 1.15/0.60 # ...of those cached : 166
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional check models : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.15/0.60 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.15/0.60 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.15/0.60 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.15/0.60 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.15/0.60 # Current number of processed clauses : 638
% 1.15/0.60 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 1.15/0.60 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 1.15/0.60 # Non-unit-clauses : 593
% 1.15/0.60 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1826
% 1.15/0.60 # ...number of literals in the above : 6244
% 1.15/0.60 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Current number of archived clauses : 99
% 1.15/0.60 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62216
% 1.15/0.60 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51927
% 1.15/0.60 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 316
% 1.15/0.60 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 348
% 1.15/0.60 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 1.15/0.60 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.15/0.60 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41390
% 1.15/0.60 # Search garbage collected termcells : 200
% 1.15/0.60
% 1.15/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.15/0.60 # User time : 0.093 s
% 1.15/0.60 # System time : 0.007 s
% 1.15/0.60 # Total time : 0.100 s
% 1.15/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 1.15/0.60
% 1.15/0.60 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.15/0.60 # User time : 0.459 s
% 1.15/0.60 # System time : 0.017 s
% 1.15/0.60 # Total time : 0.476 s
% 1.15/0.60 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 1.15/0.60 % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.15/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------